Comparison of the Effectiveness of Rumination-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Classical Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Depression, Anxiety, and Disordered Eating in Individuals with Obesity: A Single-Case Multiple-Baseline Study

Authors

Keywords:

Depression, Anxiety, Disordered eating, Rumination-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, Classical cognitive behavioral therapy, Obesity, Single-subject design, Multiple baseline

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of rumination-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (RFCBT) and classical cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in reducing depression, anxiety, and disordered eating among individuals with obesity. A single-case experimental design with multiple baselines across participants was employed. Six adults aged 18–50 years with obesity were assigned to two three-participant treatment conditions: classical CBT and RFCBT. Baseline phases were staggered across four to six measurement points, followed by eight intervention assessments and four follow-up assessments. Both interventions were delivered in 10 weekly 60-minute sessions. Depression was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-II, anxiety using the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and disordered eating using the 12-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire–Short Form. Data were analyzed through visual analysis and quantitative single-case indices, including Nonoverlap of All Pairs (NAP) and Tau-U. For baseline-to-intervention comparisons, NAP values for depression were 0.980 for classical CBT and 0.897 for RFCBT, while corresponding Tau-U values were 0.959 and 0.794. For anxiety, NAP values were 0.988 and 0.931 and Tau-U values were 0.865 and 0.751, respectively. For disordered eating, NAP values were 0.812 and 0.758, with Tau-U values of 0.624 and 0.516. In baseline-to-follow-up comparisons, NAP values reached 1.000 for depression, anxiety, and disordered eating in both treatment conditions. Tau-U reached 1.000 for depression and disordered eating in both conditions and 0.889 for anxiety. Thus, whole-intervention nonoverlap indices did not consistently favor RFCBT, whereas the overall pattern of end-point and maintenance effects indicated greater depth and persistence of change following RFCBT. Both interventions were effective in reducing depression, anxiety, and disordered eating; however, RFCBT demonstrated a more favorable pattern in the final magnitude and maintenance of therapeutic change. Targeting rumination as a transdiagnostic cognitive process may therefore enhance the longer-term effectiveness of cognitive behavioral interventions for individuals with obesity, although replication in larger and more controlled studies is warranted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Mashhadizade, H. ., Davoodi, A., Naziri, . G. ., & Fath, . N. . (1406). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Rumination-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Classical Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Depression, Anxiety, and Disordered Eating in Individuals with Obesity: A Single-Case Multiple-Baseline Study. Health Psychology and Behavioral Disorders, 1-26. https://www.jhpbd.com/index.php/hpbd/article/view/444

Similar Articles

1-10 of 266

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.